Day 8

The name branle derives from the French verb branler (to shake, wave, sway, wag, wobble), referring to the side-to-side movement of a circle or chain of dancers holding hands or linking arms. Dances of this name are encountered from about 1500 and the term is used for dances still danced in France today. Before 1500, the only dance-related use of this word is the "swaying" step of the basse danse.

The branle was danced by a chain of dancers, usually in couples, with linked arms or holding hands. The dance alternated a number of larger sideways steps to the left (often four) with the same number of smaller steps to the right so that the chain moved gradually to the left.

Although originally French dances of rustic provenance, danced to the dancers' singing, the branle was adopted, like other folk-dances, into aristocratic use by the time that printed books allow us to reconstruct the dances. A variety of branles, attributed to different regions, were danced in sequence, so that the suite of branle music gives one of the earliest examples of the classical suite of dances. Such suites generally ended with a gavotte, which seems then to have been regarded as a species of branle.

Some aristocratic branles included pantomime elements, such the branle de Poitou, the possible ancestor of the minuet, which acts out gestures of courtship. Some of these dances were reserved for specific age groups - the branle de Bourgogne, for instance, for the youngest dancers. Branle music is generally in common time somewhat like the gavotte, though some variants, like that of Poitou, are in triple time. Branles were danced walking, running, gliding, or skipping depending on the speed of the music. Among the dance's courtly relations may be the basse danse and the passepied which latter, though it is in triple time, Rabelais and Thoinot Arbeau (1589) identify as a type of Breton branle.

Text sourced from Wikipedia


  1. Stephen Hampshire says:

    There are times (like in bar 19 of this) I really wish I had a 6 course lute instead of a 7 course!

    1. Alex McCartney says:

      There’s always another lute to acquire!

  2. Ruben de Semprun says:
    Hi Alex,

    I have been enjoying your lessons very much. Something to think about every day.
    Can you tell me who made you lute? I’m always curios about the instruments as well.


    1. Alex McCartney says:

      Hi Ruben, I’m really pleased to hear that you’re enjoying these pieces!
      The lute I’m playing is by Luke Emmet at Orlando Lutes — I really like it; it’s quite a punchy 6crs.

      1. Ruben de Semprun says:
        Hi Alex,

        Yes it is. I really enjoy how there are so many good lutes these days. And your lute is as you say quite punchy. It makes the interpretation different, even though the music stays the same.


  3. Adrian Lincoln says:

    Hi Alex, I’m really enjoying your daily challenges. In today’s challenge you talk about thumb movement but unfortunately your right hand is sometimes off-camera so it’s impossible to see your finger movements clearly. Thanks, Adrian.

    1. Alex McCartney says:

      Hi Adrian,
      I’m so pleased to hear that you’re keen to grapple with these challenges! Yes, sorry about the camera setup — I do like to move about a bit.I would normally do my more formal ‘lute tutor lessons’ headless (on screen) but I thought it might be more sociable to film these at a wider angle. I’ll maybe try two cameras next year.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *